Excellence Awards Evaluations

Date *

Evaluator *

Project Evaluated *

Company Name

Project Category

National or International

Sector

Public or Private

Evaluation Outcomes

1. Ability to manage the process of defining and understanding the client requirements as these evolve during the project (Manages Client's expectations). *

Poor (1)
Disappointing (2)
Meets Expectations (3)
Exceeds Expectations (5)

2. Encourages teamwork within the Project Team *

Poor (1)
Disappointing (2)
Meets Expectations (3)
Exceeds Expectations (5)

3. Adequately coordinate the different disciplines work in Design. *

Poor (1)
Disappointing (2)
Meets Expectations (3)
Exceeds Expectations (5)

4. Ability to lead the team in seeking value-for-money alternatives in keeping with the overall affordable cost. (Steers activities to ensure project is executed within budget). *

Poor (1)
Disappointing (2)
Meets Expectations (3)
Exceeds Expectations (5)

5. Ability to deal effectively with construction quality issues that arise. (Takes action to ensure quality is not compromised) *

Poor (1)
Disappointing (2)
Meets Expectations (3)
Exceeds Expectations (5)

6. Overall professionalism and integrity of the project manager. *

Poor (1)
Disappointing (2)
Meets Expectations (3)
Exceeds Expectations (5)

7. Ability to establish an overall master programme covering design and construction stages. (Drives activities to meet the project programme). *

Poor (1)
Disappointing (2)
Meets Expectations (3)
Exceeds Expectations (5)

8. Effectiveness in managing design-client approvals and construction documentation information flow is timeous. *

Poor (1)
Disappointing (2)
Meets Expectations (3)
Exceeds Expectations (5)

9. Number of Scope Changes and Variation Orders issued acceptable (client related, professional team related, construction team related, project macro and micro environment related) *

Poor (1)
Disappointing (2)
Meets Expectations (3)
Exceeds Expectations (5)

10. Ability to foresee challenges/ potential risks & takes steps to mitigate them *

Poor (1)
Disappointing (2)
Meets Expectations (3)
Exceeds Expectations (5)

11.Innovative & creative in approach when confronted with technical challenges *

Poor (1)
Disappointing (2)
Meets Expectations (3)
Exceeds Expectations (5)

12.Communicates effectively with all stakeholders & keeps everybody informed *

Poor (1)
Disappointing (2)
Meets Expectations (3)
Exceeds Expectations (5)

13. Was the project completed within budget? (PQS) *

No = 0
Yes = 5

14. Was the project completed within time according to the programme when compared with the base-line documents? *

No = 0
Yes = 5

TOTAL SCORE OUT OF A MAXIMUM OF 70 =

Overall Comments *

Please provide overall comments including recommendations.